Usually not. In most ordinary cases, banking part of what you are owed does not cancel your right to the remainder. There is one important exception in the US, and it catches people out.
This is general information about US law, not legal advice. Talk to a lawyer about a specific case.
"Payment in full" checks and accord and satisfaction
Under section 3-311 of the Uniform Commercial Code, a claim can be discharged when a customer pays with a check or other instrument and all of the following apply:
- The customer tendered it in good faith as full satisfaction of the claim.
- The amount owed was unliquidated or subject to a bona fide dispute.
- The check, or a written note sent with it, contains a conspicuous statement that it was tendered in full satisfaction.
- You obtained payment of it, for example by depositing it.
So a check for less than the invoice, marked "paid in full" and sent while the amount is genuinely in dispute, can settle the whole debt once you cash it.
There are exceptions. A claimant can generally avoid the discharge by repaying the check amount within 90 days, and an organization can protect itself with a conspicuous written notice saying where disputed-debt payments must be sent, if the check went elsewhere. Neither helps if you, or the person responsible for the debt, knew the check was offered in full satisfaction before you collected it.
The UCC applies as each state enacts it, and the wording and case law can differ by state. If a short check arrives with "payment in full" wording on a disputed invoice, pause before depositing it and get advice.
Partial payments with no conditions
A transfer for part of the balance, with no full-settlement wording and no dispute, is normally just a payment on account. Record it, thank the customer, and ask for the rest.